Draft:Cladotherian: Difference between revisions

From Otherkin Wiki
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Issues: expand a little)
(→‎Background: first pass at explaining taxonomy to contextualize the article)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Cladotherians''' are [[Therianthrope|therians]] whose identity encompasses an entire species taxon, rather than just a single species. The taxon can be as specific a single genus, and in theory as broad as an entire order or class. A cladotherian's identity can also include extinct members of a taxon. Some feel that their identity extends into mythical and fictional versions of their taxon, or contains something of the archetypal essence of their taxon in general.
'''Cladotherians''' are [[Therianthrope|therians]] whose identity encompasses an entire species ''taxon'', rather than just a single species. The taxon can be as specific a single genus, and in theory as broad as the entire animal kingdom. A cladotherian's identity can also include extinct members of a taxon. Some feel that their identity extends into mythical and fictional versions of their taxon, or contains something of the archetypal essence of their taxon in general.

== Background ==
[[File:Taxonomic Rank Graph.svg|thumb|248x248px|A species belongs to number of increasingly broad groups all nested inside each other.]]
The various living things on earth are arranged by biologists into a sort of family tree, grouped by genetic similarity. ''Species'' is one of the most specific and most common 'levels' of the tree of life. This is the degree of specificity most therians expect to be able to narrow down their identity to. However, each species belongs to a ''genus'', and each genus belongs to a ''family'', and this nesting continues up the level of a few ''domains'' which collectively include all cellular life. These levels are commonly referred to as ''taxons''.

Therefore, while a typical therian identifies as a single species - for example, a red fox (''Vulpes vulpes'') - a cladotherian may determine that they identify as all of the true fox family (''Vulpes''), all living canids (''Caninae''), or an even wider group of species.


== Experiences ==
== Experiences ==

Latest revision as of 14:56, 9 May 2024

Cladotherians are therians whose identity encompasses an entire species taxon, rather than just a single species. The taxon can be as specific a single genus, and in theory as broad as the entire animal kingdom. A cladotherian's identity can also include extinct members of a taxon. Some feel that their identity extends into mythical and fictional versions of their taxon, or contains something of the archetypal essence of their taxon in general.

Background[edit | edit source]

A species belongs to number of increasingly broad groups all nested inside each other.

The various living things on earth are arranged by biologists into a sort of family tree, grouped by genetic similarity. Species is one of the most specific and most common 'levels' of the tree of life. This is the degree of specificity most therians expect to be able to narrow down their identity to. However, each species belongs to a genus, and each genus belongs to a family, and this nesting continues up the level of a few domains which collectively include all cellular life. These levels are commonly referred to as taxons.

Therefore, while a typical therian identifies as a single species - for example, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) - a cladotherian may determine that they identify as all of the true fox family (Vulpes), all living canids (Caninae), or an even wider group of species.

Experiences[edit | edit source]

Most cladotherians describe their cladistic identity as being a single theriotype, and reject being called polytherians on this basis.[1][2] These people may feel that their theriotype is the overarching "essence" of all the species it pertains to.[2][3] However, some cladotherians do feel that they have many discrete theriotypes.[2] Some feel their identity is a combination of these two perspectives.[3] A cladotherian may not identify as every species in their taxon equally as strongly, and some have a few species they considered to be most representative of their feelings.[4][5]

Cladotherians typically experience shifts to many or all of the members of their taxon.[1][3] The specific species can change from day to day, or moment to moment.[3] Phantom and mental shifts will feel subtly different between the various species.[1][3]

It may take cladotherians some time to conclude or accept that their identity is not limited to a specific species. A questioning person may believe they are simply having a hard time narrowing their exact species down,[3] or that they just experience frequent cameo shifts.[1][3] They may attempt to settle as one or a few species, but still feel like something is off.[1][3] Velvet Wings, a feline cladotherian, also describes dismissing the possibility initially because of the poor reputation the label had at the time.[1]

Some spiritual cladotherians believe their experience is explained by having numerous past lives as various members of their taxon.[1][3]

History & etymology[edit | edit source]

The word 'cladotherian' was coined by Mokele, who identified as all reptile species. House of Chimeras finds records of the term in use on the forum as early as 2003,[2] and Velvet Wings reports that he saw the term in 1998 or 1999.[1] The 'clado-' prefix refers to taxonomic clades;[2] these are self-contained groups on the evolutionary tree.[6]

Writing on trends in describing one's therianthropy at the time, Keller states that the term was "fiercly rejected" to begin with. They describe two primary objections they saw: people believed that no terms more specific than 'therian' were necessary, and that identifying as an entire taxon was not possible.[7] Velvet Wings similarly states that using the term was seen as a "copout".[1]

House of Chimeras wrote in 2021 that the experience was still uncommon and infrequently discussed.[2]

Issues[edit | edit source]

As cladotherianthropy is most commonly defined, a person must identify as every single species within a taxon to fall under the label.[2] However, some people contest this. Swift, a musteloid cladotherian, asserts that most cladotherians, in practise, do not identify as every species in their clade.[8]

Taxonomic ranks can be imperfect tools for describing a person's cladotype. For example, there may be no term for the set of species encapsulated by one's identity even if those species form a coherent group.[9] Additionally, species are frequently reclassified as DNA analysis reveals more about their relation to each other. House of Chimeras constructs the example of a Canis cladotherian needing to reformulate their identity after it was discovered that dire wolves are not closely related to other wolf-like canids. They question whether it would be necessary for this person to now see themselves as a Canis cladotherian and a dire wolf therian separately, even if nothing about how they experience themself has changed.[2]

Tumblr users goodnightathyrium and chasmdweller debate that the word 'cladotherian' is still necessary at all. They consider if it may have only been useful insofar as it fostered discussion at a time where the experience was not considered legitimate.[10][11]

Outside of therianthropy[edit | edit source]

People have attempted to apply the clado- concept to mythical and fictional species, but the original term's dependence on taxonomy makes this difficult.[2] goodnightathyrium argues that since the otherkin community has never culturally valued specificity of species in the same way that the therian community does (as this is "functionally impossibe"), a word to describe a vaguer form of identity would be superfluous.[10]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Velvet Wings. "Being Cladotherian" (Archived version)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 House of Chimeras. (September 21st, 2021) "A Deeper Look Into Cladotherianthropy"
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Leaps-Highest. (October 1st, 2022) "An Antlered Doe Among All Deer"
  4. Homura (dawnwyrm). (June 20th, 2022) "Feline cladotherian here 👋🏽" Comment on "I have a question for cladotherians!".
  5. Swift (stillflight). (August 21st, 2023) "Anonymous: I saw your great post about cladotherians and was wondering..."
  6. Joel Carcraft, Michael J. Donoghue. (2004) "Assembling the Tree of Life" Oxford University Press.
  7. Keller. (August 24th, 2005) "Terms and Diagrams" (Archived version)
  8. Swift (stillflight). (August 20th, 2023) "I feel like… a lot of people, and a lot of therians, don’t really understand cladotherianthropy."
  9. Swift (stillflight). (November 9th, 2023) "Also, something incredibly frustrating for me"
  10. 10.0 10.1 goodnightathyrium. (June 12th, 2021) "Ah, my word hating self appears from the mists!" Comment on "More asking out of curiosity than anything...".
  11. chasmdweller. "You know, I think I get what you’re saying..." Comment on "More asking out of curiosity than anything...". (Archived version)